What the actual....?

 Protests as newborn removed from Greenlandic mother after 'parenting competence' test

No, she hasn't failed some sort of test of how good a parent she'll be. It has to do with the fact that she herself was sexually abused by her adoptive father, and so had suffered trauma, and they didn't think she was 'Greenlandic enough', even though she is Inuit, born in Greenland, of Greenlandic parents, though living in Denmark, to qualify under a law that expressly forbids this standardised test from being used. She is being punished for being traumatised in the past, yet again, and they whisked her child away after an hour. She's allowed to see her baby once a fortnight.  This is incredulous. I don't want to hear anything at all about how the Danish system is so much better than ours again. That may be true in many ways, but at least in this case, this is out and out racist.

A good opinion piece on the real reason for Marius the Giraffe's death: profitablilty

Opinion: Killing of Marius the Giraffe Exposes Myths About Zoos: For the Copenhagen Zoo, it seems Marius was worth more dead than alive

All of which raises some questions: Why is the zoo breeding reticulated giraffes, when they are not endangered in the wild? And why did they let Marius's parents mate?

For answers, you need look no further than the Copenhagen Zoo's Facebook page, where it celebrates the birth of a baby giraffe (possibly Marius) in 2012. Humans, science has shown, are drawn to babies of all kinds; we love the big eyes, the floppy limbs, the fluff and fuzz of infants. Baby leopards, baby pandas, baby elephants ... baby giraffes. They all draw huge, paying crowds to zoos.

And while the Copenhagen Zoo, and other European Union zoos, may celebrate themselves as conservation sanctuaries protecting animals on the threshold of extinction, a 2011 report from the Born Free Foundation tells a different story: "An average of only 13% of species kept in European zoos were classified as Globally Threatened" and on the International Union for Conservation of Nature's Red List of Threatened Species.

So, if these zoos aren't really engaged in conserving species as they claim, what is their purpose?

Thanks to YKWIA

I have SMiLE.dk's 'Butterfly' in my head:



(Incidentally, the band is Swedish; their songs were first marketed in Denmark, hence the '.dk' in the name, just like Denmark's domain name.)

For a similar Danish artist, try Aqua of 'Barbie Girl' fame:



Okay, enough bubblegum pop for the day. :)